[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

GSBN: Digest for 6/24/02



This message contains a digest of the messages posted to the list today. If
you reply to this message, please be sure to change the subject line to
something meaningful. Also, be careful not to include the entire text of this
message in your reply.



---------------------------------------------------------------------


-> More from Kelly about China
     by Paul Lacinski paul@...


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: 24 Jun 2002 20:27:00 -0500
From: Paul Lacinski paul@...
Subject: More from Kelly about China

Following is the full text of Kelly's message, which includes the 
piece about flyash:

>Hi all,
>Here I am running around northeastern China. 340 houses in 4 
>provinces this year and all is going well. There are couple of 
>technical issues here that I'd like to bring to the community 
>think-tank.
>
>The first issue is relatively benign, just interesting. We finally 
>have some excellent monitoring data from last winter comparing 
>straw-bale houses and brick houses. The data was collected by the 
>Chinese Centre for Environmentally Sound Technology Transfer 
>(CESTT). They monitored 25 houses (half brick, half SB) using HOBO 
>data loggers for temperature and relative humidity as well as 
>measuring fuel use (both coal and crop residue). The data clearly 
>shows that straw-bale houses are 64 -68% more fuel efficient 
>(MJ/day) than their brick neighbors (not surprising, but still very 
>gratifying). They also observed that the relative humidity (RH) in 
>the straw-bale houses (SBH) is about 10% higher than in the brick 
>houses (RH in SB 61%, RH in BH 51%). The RH of the SHB is much 
>closer to the outdoor RH of 66.5%.
>
>I'm postulating that the straw bale walls are more vapor permeable 
>than the brick walls and thus the interior RH follow the exterior RH 
>humidity more closely. It may also be that thicker plaster on the 
>straw bale walls (compared to brick walls) is acting as a moisture 
>sink and working to balance the RH between times of high RH and low 
>RH. Any other thoughts??
>
>FYI, the whole report will be available in early July and CESTT 
>would like to present it at some technical, architectural and/or 
>sustainable development conferences. Any suggestions?
>
>The second issue has to do with plaster. Paul Lacinski and I have 
>been experimenting with plaster mixes here in China using locally 
>available materials. Last year we used flyash in several mixes (both 
>with lime and with cement). I won't go into the detailed mixes, but 
>do any of you have a feeling for the effects of flyash in plaster? 
>Clearly flyash is a pozzolanic material, and in concrete it adds 
>compressive strength and decreases workability. I'm wondering if it 
>also (like cement) makes the plaster less vapor permeable. Does 
>anyone have experience using flyash in lime plasters? There are 
>actually two types of flyash here - one is fine and powdery (very 
>similar to cement) and the other is rough and irregular, up to 3mm 
>diameter. We've used both types. The rough type is actually more 
>like an aggregate though it does seem to have a very weak pozzolanic 
>reaction. Any thoughts on flyash and permeability or suitability for 
>plasters?
>
>Thanks,
>
>Kelly
>----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>Kelly Lerner
>One World Design
>http://www.one-world-design.com
>510-525-8582
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>Kelly Lerner
>One World Design
>http://www.one-world-design.com
>510-525-8582


- -- 
Paul Lacinski
Amy Klippenstein
GreenSpace Collaborative
Sidehill Farm
PO Box 107
463 Main St.
Ashfield, MA 01330 USA
01-413-628-3800


----------------------------------------------------------------------

End of Digest

To request a copy of the help file, reply to this message and put "help" in
the subject.